Pay My Bill
Payment
Request Appointment
Appointments

The Research

Epidimiology and Incidence of Penile Implant Surgery:

  1. Saavedra-Belaunde JA, Clavell-Hernandez J, Wang R. Epidemiology regarding penile prosthetic surgery. Asian J Androl. 2020 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-7.
  2. Lee DJ, Najari BB, Davison WL, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Zhao F, Paduch DA, Mulhall JP, Chughtai B, Lee RK. Trends in the Utilization of Penile Prostheses in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction in the United States. J Sex Med. 2015 Jul;12(7):1638-45.
  3. aas W, O’Connor B, Welliver C, Stahl PJ, Stember DS, Wilson SK, Köhler TS. Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants. Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Feb;9(1):31-37.

Benefits of Vacuum Erection Device or Traction Therapy Use Prior to Surgery and Post-operative penile rehabilitation:

  1. T. Sellers, M. Dineen, E.A. Salem, et al. Vacuum preparation, optimization of cylinder length and postoperative daily inflation reduces complaints of shortened penile length following implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis. Adv Sex Med, 3 (2013), pp. 14-18
  2. H. Kim, S.W. Lee. Current status of penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy. Korean J Urol, 56 (2015), pp. 99-108
  3. L.A. Levine, J. Rybak. Traction therapy for men with shortened penis prior to penile prosthesis implantation: a pilot study. J Sex Med, 8 (2011), pp. 2112-2117
  4. G.D. Henry, R. Carrion, C. Jennermann, et al. Prospective evaluation of postoperative penile rehabilitation: penile length/girth maintenance 1 year following Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med, 12 (2015), pp. 1298-1304

Benefits of Surgery by Centers of Excellence:

  1. Henry GD, Kansal NS, Callaway M, Grigsby T, Henderson J, Noble J, Palmer T, Cleves MA, Ludlow JK, Simmons CJ, Mook TM. Centers of excellence concept and penile prostheses: an outcome analysis. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):1264-8.
  2. Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Hendin BN. Factors influencing the outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery at a teaching institution. Urology. 2003 Nov;62(5):918-21.

Differences in Penile Implant Types and Axial Rigidity:

  1. Wallen JJ, Barrera EV, Ge L, Pastuszak AW, Carrion RE, Perito PE, Hakky TS. Biomechanical Comparison of Inflatable Penile Implants: A Cadaveric Pilot Study. J Sex Med. 2018 Jul;15(7):1034-1040.
  2. Madiraju SK, Wallen JJ, Rydelek SP, Carrion RE, Perito PE, Hakky TS. Biomechanical Studies of the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: A Review. Sex Med Rev. 2019 Apr;7(2):369-375.
  3. Scovell JM, Ge L, Barrera EV, Wilson SK, Carrion RE, Hakky TS. Longitudinal and Horizontal Load Testing of Inflatable Penile Implant Cylinders of Two Manufacturers: An Ex Vivo Demonstration of Inflated Rigidity. J Sex Med. 2016 Nov;13(11):1750-1757.

Tunical Expansion Procedure:

  1. Egydio PH. An Innovative Strategy for Non-Grafting Penile Enlargement: A Novel Paradigm for Tunica Expansion Procedures. J Sex Med. 2020 Oct;17(10):2093-2103.
  2. Egydio PH. Enlargement of length and girth associated with implantation of penile prostheses. Actas Urol Esp. 2020 Jun;44(5):333-339.

Penile Size: Psychologic & Physiologic Impacts

  1. J. Lever, D.A. Frederick, L.A. Peplau, Does size matter? Men’s and women’s views on penis size across the lifespan, Psychol Men Masc, 7 (2006), pp. 129-143
  2. Y. Akin, I.F. Sahiner, M.F. Usta. The impact of diabetes mellitus on penile length in men undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Turk J Urol, 39 (2013), pp. 161-164
  3. Y. Kadono, K. Machioka, K. Nakashima, et al. Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: investigation of the underlying anatomical mechanism. BJU Int, 120 (2017), pp. 293-299
  4. Shah T, Wang R. A Review of Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction With Inflatable Penile Prosthesis. Sex Med Rev. 2020 Jun 21:S2050-0521(20)30035-4. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.04.001. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32580912.

Corporal (Erectile Body) Sparing Approach:

  1. A. Zaazaa, T. Mostafa. Spontaneous penile tumescence by sparing cavernous tissue in the course of malleable penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med, 16 (2019), pp. 474-478
  2. I. Moncada, J.I. Martinez-Salamanca, J. Jara, et al. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation without corporeal dilation: a cavernous tissue sparing technique. J Urol, 183 (2010), pp. 1123-1126

Girth & Length Preservation/Enhancement:

  1. Shah BB, Kent M, Valenzuela R. Advanced Penile Length Restoration Techniques to Optimize Penile Prosthesis Placement Outcomes. Sex Med Rev. 2020 Jul 9:S2050-0521(20)30050-0
  2. T.W. Fuller, K.M. Theisen, A. Shah, et al. Surgical management of adult acquired buried penis. Curr Urol Rep, 19 (2018), p. 22
  3. C.D. Gaffney, M.J. Pagano, A.C. Weinberg, et al. Lengthening strategies for peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol, 5 (2016), pp. 351-362
  4. J . Anaissie, F.A. Yafi. A review of surgical strategies for penile prosthesis implantation in patients with peyronie’s disease. Transl Androl Urol, 5 (2016), pp. 342-350
  5. H. Tran, R. Goldfarb, A. Ackerman, R. Valenzuela. Penile lengthening, girth, and size preservation at the time of penile prosthesis insertion. Sex Med Rev, 5 (2017), pp. 403-412
  6. A. Miranda-Sousa, M. Keating, S. Moreira, et al. Concomitant ventral phalloplasty during penile implant surgery: a novel procedure that optimizes patient satisfaction and their perception of phallic length after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med, 4 (2007), pp. 1494-1499
  7. A.S. Baumgarten, J.A. Beilan, B.B. Shah, et al. Suprapubic fat pad excision with simultaneous placement of inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med, 16 (2019), pp. 333-337
  8. F. Borges, L. Hakim, C. Kline. Surgical technique to maintain penile length after insertion of an inflatable penile prosthesis via infrapubic approach. J Sex Med, 3 (2006), pp. 550-553
  9. L. Rolle, M. Falcone, C. Ceruti, et al. A prospective multicentric international study on the surgical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction rates of the ‘sliding’ technique for end-stage peyronie’s disease with severe shortening of the penis and erectile dysfunction. BJU Int, 117 (2016), pp. 814-820
  10. P.H. Egydio, F.E. Kuehhas. Penile lengthening and widening without grafting according to a modified ‘sliding’ technique. BJU Int, 116 (2015), pp. 965-972
  11. P.H. Egydio, F.E. Kuehhas. The multiple-slit technique (MUST) for penile length and girth restoration. J Sex Med, 15 (2018), pp. 261-269
  12. Campbell J, Gillis J. A review of penile elongation surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(1):69-78. doi:10.21037/tau.2016.11.19
  13. Henry GD, Carrion R, Jennermann C, Wang R. Prospective evaluation of postoperative penile rehabilitation: penile length/girth maintenance 1 year following Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2015 May;12(5):1298-304.

Complications and long term studies of penile surgeries:

  1. Chierigo F, Capogrosso P, Dehò F, Pozzi E, Schifano N, Belladelli F, Montorsi F, Salonia A. Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes. J Sex Med. 2019 Nov;16(11):1827-1833.
  2. Gon LM, de Campos CCC, Voris BRI, Passeri LA, Fregonesi A, Riccetto CLZ. A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role. BMC Urol. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):35
  3. Carvajal A, Benavides J, García-Perdomo HA, Henry GD. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Nov;32(6):587-597.
  4. Wilson SK, Mora-Estaves C, Egydio P, Ralph D, Habous M, Love C, Shamsodini A, Valenzuela R, Yafi FA. Glans Necrosis Following Penile Prosthesis Implantation: Prevention and Treatment Suggestions. Urology. 2017 Sep;107:144-148
  5. Furr J, Hebert K, Wisenbaugh E, Gelman J. Complications of Genital Enlargement Surgery. J Sex Med. 2018 Dec;15(12):1811-1817.
  6. Chung PH, Siegel JA, Tausch TJ, Klein AK, Scott JM, Morey AF. Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence? Int Braz J Urol. 2017 Sep-Oct;43(5):911-916
  7. Chan EP, Punjani N, Campbell JD, Abed H, Brock G. Indications for Penile Prosthesis Revision: Lessons Learned to Limit Technical Causes of Reoperation. J Sex Med. 2019 Sep;16(9):1444-1450.

Research

The Research